Are the Gold Gloves tarnished?


Gail Burton / AP

I do not know what to think about the recent results of the 2009 Rawlings Gold Glove awards. I guess it kind of reminds me of the days when the “cool” group in my High School used to sit on this wall outside the 100 wing of the school before and after school, and we collectively nicknamed them the “Ivy’s” since ivy clings to walls. I get that same feeling now when I first saw the list of American League Gold Glove winners.

But what I saw behind the names had an old instant of nostalgia of that long ago Southern staple,the “Good Ol’ Boys” network.  For years when I was growing up here in Florida it was a wildly held political belief that some people got elected and also appointed to a high ranking position because of their friendships or political ties to a person instead of their qualifications and leadership abilities. And is some realms of the world this system is still alive and well today. 

For some weird reason, I am beginning to get more of a feeling of true professionalism and in-depth analysis from the Fielding Bible Awards than from the more commercial and MLB-friendly Rawlings Gold Glove Awards.  And that sentiment might be felt more and more around the Major League Baseball fan community as we see some of the old guard in baseball still hanging onto these Gold Glove awards even if their defensive skills have diminished a bit in the last season. 

There has been a small group of up and coming MLB players who also produced some impressive defensive numbers and also feats this season who did not seem to get any acknowledgment on the 2009 list. At least with the Fielding Bible, they had a tremendous fight at the second base position between Adam Hill, Dustin Pedroia and Chase Utley before the groups tally produced a tie between Pedroia and Hill. Because of the tie, the group used its tie-breaking format of total first place votes( 10 points) to decide the eventual winner of the award. Hill had 4 first place votes to one for Pedroia.

Steve Nesius / AP

Of course my main concern with the Gold Gloves here might be for the third year in a row, the award has seemed to snub Tampa Bay Rays outfielder Carl Crawford. Maybe it was the ease at which Crawford seems to glide and catch difficult fly balls as they are going towards the wall or in the air. Maybe it is that with his abundance of speed you expect him to make a play like that and it takes on a  more routine feel after seeing it day after day since 2001.

But maybe he might be a great poster boy to boost prop up right now to show that there might need to be some changes made within the Gold Glove voting system. As we all know by now, Crawford won his third Fielding Bible Award in 2009 for his play in leftfield. And right now the Fielding Bible actually has more of my respect because they do not bunch the outfield into a single category, but award the players in each of the three outfield defensive position for their efforts and abilities.

A good example of this is outfielder Franklin Gutierrez, who won his second Fielding Bible award in a row,but in a different position for 2009. That’s right,he won the award in 2008 as a rightfielder, and was rewarded in 2009 as the centerfielder in the Seattle Mariner’s outfield. For that reasoning alone it seems like the Fielding Bible awards excellence by position,and not by name recognition.

And I think when Rawlings officially started the Gold Glove awards back in 1957 they envisioned the competitions voting to evolve with the game and even transform to meet the ever-changing aspects of the game. But the award has now seemed to become a bit stagnant and has wielded more of a “Prom” popularity atmosphere where the popular kids are getting the Gold Glove awards, and not the deserving people also playing the game besides them.

The Gold Gloves have been viewed as the “Mount Everest” of fielding awards. That to get a spot on that exclusive roster of MLB players is a showing to the world that you have arrived, and are within the top 18 players in the Major Leagues.

Elaine Thompson / AP

But the one position on these collective teams that appear to have become muddled beyond simplicity is the outfield selection for the Gold Glove. There can be a possibility of three centerfielders winning the Gold Glove currently, and nothing can be done about it. And in 2009, two centerfielders made the list out of the possible three slots.

But a bit of controversy erupted when the AL 2009 results were announced  and revealed that Baltimore centerfielder Adam Jones was the third member of the Gold Glove outfield for 2009. Now I think Jones is a great emerging star since his trade from Seattle to Baltimore a few seasons ago, but is his rise so great in 2009 that it trumped the stats and play of a player like Crawford?

And here lies the wild truth that certain players seem to be selected year after year even as their abilities start to show age and flaws in their defense. The Gold Glove award is currently voted on  only by the Managers and Coaches of each individual league, and they can not vote for a member of their respective teams for the award. Maybe it is time to tweak the system a bit and make it a more universally accepted award than a glorified baseball beauty pageant.

Maybe the current system is stagnating  and is quickly becoming an antiquated system to award the Major League’s best in defensive excellence. Maybe we need to inject some new blood and some extended voting members into the equation like possibly enlisting the last two seasons of Gold Glove winners to dissolve the  popularity chaos for the award. 

Steve Nesius / AP

Since every MLB Manager and Coach can not vote for their own players, maybe the simple fact of adding a few more sets of eyes that see these players daily might throw some more excitement in the process and actually make this more of a “professionally-based” award than a popularity contest aka beauty pageant.

If the system was more like the Fielding bible Awards would Crawford had been selected as a Gold Glove recipient? You would think that would be an easy answer, but Jones won a Gold Glove while appearing in 36 less games than Crawford. .

But this is a “no-win” situation because we all know that the powers above (Commissioner Selig) will not entertain the notion to tweak the system and actually award the best players at their positions for the Gold Glove. And in a way that is okay. Most people have the same problems with the College Football ranking system and the eventual awarding of their seasonal seeding via the BCS formula.

Maybe Rawlings needs to look at the Fielding Bible a bit closer for possible inspiration and the essence of  wanting to change the rules. Because in the Fielding Bible system, the award is voted on by people outside the influence of Major League Baseball.  Think about it,  a total of 10 baseball eggheads/analysts make their random scaling from 1-10 for every spot on the field. And the outfield is broken up into their three positions and awarded accordingly.

Such baseball gurus like Baseball Info Solutions John Dewan, ESPN Baseball expert Peter Gammons, Joe Posnanski of Sports Illustrated and the Kansas City Star
and of course the Stat brain child, Bill James use the same 10-point system instituted by Major League Baseball to eventually pick the Major League Baseball MVP award to tally their personal votes for the Fielding Bible Award. And maybe that is a direction that the Gold Gloves  should embrace as a model for change.

By adding outside influences and maybe even the past two seasons award winners into the mix, it could become more universally accepted for its fair and concise measuring of players abilities and achievements. Right now the Gold Gloves is a popularity system that is rewarding name worthy recipients than qualified winners.

Tom Gannam / AP

And a perfect example of this might be the Fielding Bible voting for Crawford’s position in the 2009 awards. With 10 voters able to cast up to 10 points for each candidate, a perfect score would be 100 points.  So according to the voters Crawford was the best leftfielder in the game of baseball in 2009. And he was not perfect, but his score of 99 points was the largest tally ever since the 98 total points given to Adam Everett in 2006.

So neither awards system is perfect. And there will always be some teams fans voice crying in the night about their guy being worthy. But right now the Gold Glove is not a fair competition, and maybe change will come in the future. And by the way, only 2009 Gold Glove winner Ichiro Suzuki was selected to also receive a Fielding Bible Award this season.  Shows that maybe the system needs a push in the right direction. And maybe the best don’t always get the gold.


It does seem odd that the three Gold Gloves for outfielders are generic and not position-specific. It seems to me that there are distinct skill sets needed for each position, so why not reward the best player at each position? To have two or possible even three centerfielders win the award is just not right.
Rants, Raves, and Random Thoughts

I have to say I was surprised Crawford didn’t win, but more so that he wasn’t really in the running, when you think a great player at his position is normally rated by lowest errors, coupled with outfield assists and players held by outfielders actions, with frequency of starts taken into account then there is no doubt that Crawford should have been a front runner…. but as you say popularity seems to be the theme, and I agree each position should be a separate Glove, they should take the same action with the All Star game too, break the outfield into positions, not just any 3 outfielders….
Outside the Phillies Looking In

My biggest beef was Jeter winning it. He had one of his best seasons, but there were still 4 or 5 shortstops better than him. He won it on reputation, not talent.

when Brian Giles was a Pirate, I always thought he deserved it. Just last year, Nate McClouth was a gold glover for the Bucs. I don’t think he deserved it though. CC has always been golden with the glove, hopefully one year the voters will take notice

I totally sgree with you there.
But for some odd reason it has been that way ever since 1957.
You would think the award would have adapted before today, but for some reason it has stayed the same.

Rays Renegade

the All Star game voting by position might be hard due to injuries at times. Take the case of the Rays Ben Zobrist in 2009. Where does he play? second, rightfield, leftfield, thrid base and shortstop. And by the end of the year after Pena’s injury, he was also standing on first base.
Seriously, the corner outfielder have more of a lateral game towards the lines than a centerfielder, so more ways to commit an error in some instances.
If it is to the left or right of a centerfielder in the gap, they run to it ans hope to catch up with its flight in the air.

Rays Renegade

That is one of the positions to me that showed the most improvement in 2009. With Elvis Andruss in Texas, Marc Scutaro in Toronto and Jason Bartlett with the Rays showing great leather all year long.
But the Yankee mystic did not win the award for Jeter. His defense was a bit limited in range for the first time, but he still had some amazing plays that some guys would give up on and watch the outfielder throw back into second base.
His reputation might have won it, but the young guns are making huge strides, and he will have to earn it in 2010.

Rays Renegade

I also thought Giles had a shot at it, but we can only guess why they went another direction.
In the outfield for the Gold Gloves I agree totally with Ichiro Suzuki. And combined with Franklin Guteirrez they had the best defensive outfield numbers in the Major Leagues.
Torri Hunter is a step slower because of injuries this season, but is still a joy to watch go back on the ball.
Adam Jones is remarkable, but not worthy of it this season. If it had to go to a Baltimore player, I would have given it to Nick Markakis, because he is the best outfielder on the Orioles, not Jones……sorry Adam.

Rays Renegade

There certainly is the old boy network mentality in all this, but Longoria got one and he’s a newbie. Jeter desereves his. Just watch how hard he works on every play. Fun to watch.

I think we’ll always say, “Why didn’t so-and-so win?” It’s the nature of awards, period. Whenever you get people together to pick “the best,” you find that “best” is subjective, even with all the stats available.

I consider Longoria a bit of the “new class” that MLB is going to market for a long time.
Only one other third baseman in the league smacked the ball like Longo this season, and he is not the poster boy to throw up ast the masses right now ( A Rod).
Jeter is one guy I question on the list, but also agree he is still the top dog for now .

Rays Renegade

That was perfectly put.
It is true, you always want to see “your guy” get the glory.
But in Crawford’s case, I really think his season spoke for itself, but it fell on deaf ears with the voting memebership of the Gold Gloves.
I guess becuase he has won 3 out of the last 4 Fielding Bible awards you would think he would get one Gold Glove.
Maybe 2010.

Rays Renegade

Many people think that because the centerfielders cover the most ground, they have the harder job. Each position has a tough job.

There always seems to be someone snubbed, much like the All-Star selections. And the Jeter thing does make me scratch my head…now I love Jeter, but with his huge popularity, it does appear that no one else stands a chance. That is sad :O(


They might be the best athletes are certain teams, but sometimes the best can be on those corner spots. Who is to say that Vlad Guerrero’s arm when he was in righftield had an equal in the AL, but Crawford turned down Centerfield knowing that teammate Rocco Baldelli loved that spot years ago.
Center of attention might be centerfield, but the corner guys also provide outs and thrills, so they should not be shunned.

Rays Renegade

that is a reason I like the Fielding Bible more than the Rawling Gold Gloves.
It is the best at that position in the enitre league, not based on AL or NL agendas.
I mean Jayson Werth is the one guy on your team that evokes a question mark for me.
I think he is as athletic as they come, and he gets minumal respect for some reason.

Rays Renegade

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s